Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Cenacle - In hidden crypts and dark vaults, cenacles of secret religion meet to keep their flame alive.

Cenacle - January 2007

How should a history be written? This is second century satirist Lucian's take on the subject.

Too many people he warns want to be a Thucydides, a Herodotus or a Xenophon. History writing is easy; all it needs is that you translate your thoughts into words.

History's purpose should be establishment of truth and not devotion to beauty. After going through a list of history writer's follies, here are some instructions to histroy writers for writing a good history:

Such an historian would I wish to have under my care: with regard
to language and expression, I would not have it rough and vehement,

consisting of long periods, {58} or complex arguments; but soft,
quiet, smooth, and peaceable. The reflections, short and frequent,
the style clear and perspicuous; for as freedom and truth should be
the principal perfections of the writer's mind, so, with regard to
language, the great point is to make everything plain and
intelligible, not to use remote and far-fetched phrases or
expressions, at the same time avoiding such as are mean and vulgar:
let it be, in short, what the lowest may understand; and, at the
same time, the most learned cannot but approve. The whole may be
adorned with figure and metaphor, provided they are not turgid or
bombast, nor seem stiff and laboured, which, like meat too highly
seasoned, always give disgust.

Wish more historians follow this sage advice.
66
Vote
   


Gilead by Marilynne Robinson

January 30th 2007 07:12
Gilead by Marilynne Robinson

Gilead is Marilynne Robinson's second novel published some 24 years after her first Housekeeping. Robinson is a bonafide literray genius working today and her seocnd novel was promptly awarded a Pulitzer prize. Some secualr liberals hav reacted tendentiously toward the novel simply because it includes Christianity in it; I found their ractions every bit as silly as the "Christianists" objecting to Harry Potter simply because there were spirits involved.


Gilead is a town in Iowa and the novel is a long letter by Ames who is seventy seven years old and has been told he has angina pectoris. Not having much to leave his wife and child, he is writing a letter to his son to serve hima s his "begats." The long letter however meanders through a 100 years and tell the the tale of fathers and sons of four generations. It is also a tale of war which starts with the Civil war and ends on the cusp of Vietnam. It is also the tale of America, as it winds through barren landscape and fallen towns and through the minds of people who are conditioned by living in such a big country.

Robinson writes a sublime prose in that quintessential American voice that rings in Hawthorne and Dickinson. It is one of the few books that you'd feel privileged and blessed after having the chance to read them.

It is a book that renews your faith in literature. I had wanted to write a longish review of this novel and so kep it on the bakcburner for a long time. This small notice will have to until I read it again and come up with the review.

62
Vote
   


Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind

The CIA is messing with my mind. I am sure that's why I watch and keep watching stupid movies even when I know what will be in them. Like Eternal Sunshine of Spotless Mind which I watched last week, having nothing better to do. The movie was so transparent I could see through its shenanigans even before the movie ended.

This paranoia about CIA messing with minds has yielded plot points for many a feature film and novels now. The earliest novel I can remember is Shapes of Sleep by J.B.Priestley, the usual lib-trash. And there are a raft of movies from The Cell to Deja Vu and not too mention, Goodbye Lenin. Well, it's not just the CIA but the paranoia of the Brotherhood always starts and ends with CIA, so when we mention CIA you can also include capitalism, greedy corporations, police investigators and any other appurtenances except the Welfare Department.

The Eternal Sunshine of Spotless Mind tells the story of a man whose girlfriend has not only left him but also has erased every memory of his using a chipper technology which can erase selective memories. Feeling aggrieved, the man wants to erase his own memories. Surely a technology which can selectively erase memories should be a state of the art technology. But, the first thing you notice is that it is offered by an unknown company staffed by members you can count on your fingers and generally gives you the impression of being a garage start-up. Meaning, this sort of memory manipulation is di rigeur.

The man is told to collect every little thing that might remind him of his girlfriend and destroy those signs and then take a sleeping pill and sleep. During the sleep, the technicians will do their stuff and when the man wakes up, he won't remember his girlfirend any more, not even that he has requested the memory erasure. The technicians who do it are very irreverent about the job and even have sex while they are at it. The man is subliminally aware of their conversations and his subconscious decides to put up a fight and hide his memories where they will not look for them. Elsewhere, his girlfriend still dimly remembers the romance and as the erasing operation is doomed to failure, you know the lovebirds will be back together.

The man then is your typical garned variety liberal and the woman is his utopia. No matter how hard the explosion of corporate greed tries to erase the memories of the utopia from people's minds, our brothers will fight hard to keep the memories alive and once the memories are in tact, they can always get back, the tiffs don't matter. Do not give up the dream of the stateless utopia just yet. Keep dreaming.
65
Vote
   


Dreamgirls: Not so dreamy

January 25th 2007 07:20

Dreamgirls is a broadway musical adapted to screen after more than twenty years and like all such adaptations, it came with a dismissive anxiety about whether musicals can be still trusted as viable movie vehicles. I like musicals and I constantly wonder at a culture which has forgotten to sing.After all, song is the first form of creative expression but that fact is given short shrift in the age of reality tv and docudramas. If a character breaks into a song in the middle of a dialogue, we get embarassed. We need more reality than that.

I like musicals in priniciple. That is why when Dreamgirls opened to rave reviews, I waited to watch it with patient excitement. I had read all the reviews , dutifully saw the Jennifer Holliday video, to be prepared to compare it with Jennifer Hudson's performance and educated myself on the history of motown and Supremes. But, the movie came as a definite disappointment.

The problems with the movie is its director Bill COndon who earlier adapted Chicago for the screen and helms a movie for the first time here. He is one hell of an inexperienced guy. He places stunning song sequences in awkward areas nearly killing them. The much talked about And I Am Telling you I am not going was set in the make-up room in the Broadway show, but here it is placed on the main stage making it very awkward for Jennifer Hudson to bring out the same emotion. The movie has potential for drama, heartbreak and redemption but none of it shines through the maudlin presentation. The director cuts from scene to scene before the emotional impact from any scene could be fully extracted. It becomes a particularly bad parody of a musical; a movie where there are only songs and whatever story there is, is rushed over. That's a tragedy because there is a good story to tell. Neither does it help matters that the political commentary that Condon forces into the movie is strident and feels contrived.

Jennifer Hudson can sing well, there's no doubt about it. When she sings, she and the auditorium comes alive. But, in acting department she is definitely a fish out of water. Beyonce Knowles looks stunningly pretty and acts well too. I thought Eddie Murphy was too overrated and Jamie Fox quite inadequate for somebody of his billing.
81
Vote
   


The prominent feature of a hero across different mythologies are the mysterious circumstances surrounding his birth. They are born in difficult circumstances and are brought up in a different family than their own. At one point in his life, the hero becomes aware of his true parentage.

Otto Rank belonged to the innre circle of Freud's admirers and in this work, rank applies the psycho-analytic theory of Freud to these myths, making this one of the first attempts at psycho-analytic interpretation of mythologies. This became a cottage industry thereafter.

The heroes Rank examines are Sargon, Karna, Lohengrin, Moses, Perseus,Telephus, Romulus, Hercules, Gilgamesh, Paris, Jesus, Tristan, Siegfried, Cyrus and of course Oedipus.

Rank briefly describes the legends surrounding the heroes and then gives his interpretation of myths. The list is not particularly exhaustive and is notable for complete exclusion of any female heroes. Heroines like Atalanta, Semiramis and Shakunthala too have the similar themes surrounding their births. One flaw of psycho-analyis was the insignificance of female psychology and this study reveals the lacuna quite early on.



58
Vote
   


As I was reading about the Amazons, I stumbled on this piece by Florence Mary Bennett on the net. It's there on Bulfinch's mythology and on sacred texts as well. A scholary dissertation on the religious beliefs of Amazons, it searches for the extensive references of Amazons in classical literarture, wherever they are mentioned in regards to their religious beliefs.

The list is comprehensive as Bennett searches through the maze of classical references, she finds many instances to the religious practices of Amazons. theier main object of worship seems to be a baetylic or aniconic form of Mother Goddess, similar to the famous Phrygian Goddess Cybele whose baetyl was transferred to Rome to ward of Hannibal's attacks.

Amazons are said to have worshipped pre-eminently at the Artemesium of Ephesus, one of the seven wonders of classical antiquity. As Bennett searches the various Goddesses that Amazons said to have worshipped, she draws a common characteristic: they were all war-goddesses. Even Goddesses known for other attributes like Aphrodite seem to have war function.

Bennett then examines the male gods that Amazons were said to have worshipped and this is where she leads into hornet's nest. All the male gods seem to have an effeminate characteristic to them and this leads into the area of Corybantes, Curetes and Dactylii.

Bennett's thesis then is that Amazons were initially a cult of worshippers of a war-like Mother Goddess, just like the Corybantes and others, who probably cut off their breasts in the heat of worship. This gave them a fierce repuatation and whenever later classical writers met women warriors, they referredd to them as Amazons.

The treatise was written in 1913, so some of the intital discussion about the war-like goddess is somewaht dated but when Bennett steers into the cultic angle, the discussion gets complicated and fascinating. I thought her conclusion was a bit too pat but this is still remains a fascinating read.
72
Vote
   


Amazons: Who were they?

January 20th 2007 03:58
Amazons. Who hasn't heard of these fearless nation of women warriors? Hippolyta, Penthesilea and other immortal names? They have forever scarred people's imaginations as brave women, fierce but graceful, dangerous and sexy at the same time. A women-hating, homosexual English poet called Shakespeare even used an Amazon heroine to portray a brutish, marm-like dyke to vent his spleen.

According to ancient Greek legends, they were supposed to be a nation composed of entirely women who were trained for war and fearless in waging it. They were so committed to bravery that they even burned their right breast off so that it will be easier for them to us e abow and arrow. Only women were allowed in their society but to prevent them from dying up, they would kidnap hapless men from neighbouring countries, get pregnant and breed girl children. They even marched right up to Athens, to claim their queen who had been fisked by the upstart Theseus.

The myths are clear and consistent and you have to remember that even Homer was accused of being a fabulist until Schliemann found Troy or remains of a city that could be Troy. If so many other Greek traditions have been found to be true, they why not this, one of the most persistent and colorful of all legends? And its not just Greeks. They appear in mythic traditions across "three continents", as Sacred-texts.com site puts it.

The ruse of women burning their right breast is remarkably used in Silappadikaram, a Tamil Epic, where this act becomes the apotheotic climax. This epic is set in Kaveripattanam, a big port connected to the rest of the world through sea. Even though the herione in the epic is a housewife and not a martial warrior, remember merchants were the surest way of transmission of tales in the ancient world. And the tales of handsome warriors being forced to impregnate a nation of women are a legion, to be found in various chivalric literatures.

People who looked for the original Amazons have generally considered Sarmatians as the most likely candidate for them. This is a little known Scythian tribe whose men were accused of being ruled over by women. This particualr accusation too has been repeated for Scythian protoypes wherever they appear in legends, whether in Indo-Iran or in Greece. So much so that an archealogist, who first stumbled on a few Sarmatian inscriptions in Asia Minor would joyfully exclaim that he had found the Amazons.

But, beautiful and fierce, this nation of warrior women remains elusive as ever.
92
Vote
   


Philistines: Who were they?

January 17th 2007 08:44
Philistines. If you have ever read Bible, you must be familiar with the name. Yet who were these people? They are now generally thought to be of Indo- European origin and spoke an Indo_European lanaguage. For more on this, see below. You might have seen a series called Lost Tribes currently airing on television. I thought this week we'd rather dig through the colorless term called "Indo-Europeans" and find those lost tribes who still animate our thoughts even though they have vanished from history for thousands of years.

Philistines first appear on Egyptian insciptions as Prst, part of a naval confederacy that more or less simultaneously raided all the known empires back then. The Hittites, the Mitanni, the Myceneans and the Egyptians, some of the most glorious empires that ever were known. Of them only Egypt would survive the raids of these unknown raiders. Of the twelve or so tribes which comprised the confederacy, one was mentioned as PRST. After supplying the vowels it could be read pereset, pulasati and other forms.

These raiders then seized the Canaanite lands and established control in five cities: Gaza, Ashkelon, Ekron, Gath and Ashdod. Thecities would be called Pentapolis and the people gradually known as Philistines. They would remain visible in history for the next few centuries until finally subjugated by the Babylonians.

It is an immensely important time in history, if you measure the impact in terms of the effect on mental landscape. Men all over the world have not been able to shake of the impact of those times.

When Philistines were increasing their hold on Canaanite lands, the Hebrews too appear in history, locked in a struggle for the same territory with these people. It is also possible that the Hebrews themselves were dislodged from Egypt (if they were ever there) by the Sea People attacks. A major part of Old testament was authored in such a context.

The Philistines were also instrumental in eclipsing the beautiful Mycenean civilization that was thriving on Crete. Yes, it is from the continued memory of Crete that the legends of the minotaur , the bull-headed prince locked up in a maze called labyrinth, would germinate and grow.

One version of their name, Pulasati, is remarkably similar to Pulsatya, the father of Ravana in the Indian epic Ramayana. It has been conjectured that the Ramayana might preserve the distant echoes of those times.

From Wiki, I got to know another important tidbit of information. The Phjilistines had a monopoly on iron-smithing. The use of iron in war was first accomplished in Hittite empire, so that might have surivived in the people who deposed them. Wiki says that this is apparent in the Goliath legends. That is not the only legend which is based on iron. A significant portion of relgious mythology was affected by the arrival of iron. Remember the terms like golden, silver and bronze ages. These are eras before iron was discovered and both large scale destruction and large scale clearing of forests and settling was made possible. Iron is almost unanimously represented as evil. In Hindu mythology, we are living in Kali Yuga, a time of evil and general dissolution. It generally corresponds to changes wrought in by Iron.

Bible, Ramayana and the Greek legends: three mythic traditions central to our own consciousness. They were all shaped by the actions and memory of Philistines. They also have survived in our language. No small achievement for a people who remained in history for about five centuries and then disappeared completely.


84
Vote
   


Aryans: Who were they?

January 15th 2007 07:05
One of the great discoveries of nineteenth century was the fact that a lot of human languages from Latin to Sanskrit were so closely related that they could be counted as one family. This eventually came to be known as the Indo-European family. Further studies revealed that the people who spoke these languages also shared a remarkable similarity in religion, mythology and general culture. Were they at some point in time one people who latter differentiated into many peoples?

The people who made these connections at the time were European and white and they saw in this remarkable unity, a chance to find the original Aryan ancestors and the original home of the white race. It also gave rise to remarkable range of mysticism around the globe, not the least the attraction Aryanism had for the nazis. This inevitably lead to nativist reaction in many parts around the world; most importantly, in India where an Out of India theory developed.

For all the vicissitudes in scholarship from those early neo-grammarians to the anthropologists of today, the question refuses to go away. The current claimant to the throne is the so called Kurgan hypothesis proposed by Zimbuthas. The Indo-Europeans were supposed to have originated in the Kurgan culture, in Ukrainian steppe.


There is certainly no dispute that there is a deep affinity among a widespread cultural and linguistic artefacts and that this affinity is remarkable. What I found unusual is that the affinity continued even when the supposedly single race differentiated into many peoples. For example, Zeus and Indra, both of them patriarchal thunder storm gods, became equally concupiscent at the fag end of their careers before being supplanted by younger gods. Why such an ignoble demotion for both of them? This similarity in the fate of the gods is perhaps an indication that more than a common heritage, we may also share a common imagination.

61
Vote
   


Night at the Museum


Night at the Museum was billed as an old fashioned action comedy but when I went to watch the show, I found the matter was more involved than that. Ben Stiller plays this frequently out of job dad whose ex-wife thinks that their son cannot handle any more "disappointment." So, he takes up this job as a night watchman at the museum of natural history. The museum has three ageing watchmen who are being laid off. They give him a thick sheaf of instructions and leave him alone. But they forget to tell one thing. Everything comes alive in the museum at night and create a mayhem unless controlled rather niftily.

The first night predictably goes horribly wrong. But, Stiller has to come over and again to the action, because daddy can't risk another disappointment for his son. So, he decides to learn to manage the waxworks come to life.

The movie clearly follows the same premise and pattern seen in Zumanji and Zathura but unlike them ties up its loose ends rather comprehensively if a bit slowly at the end. What is old-fashioned about it is that it is an appeal for unity. Ancient Europeans, Romans and Mongols have all to get together with the cowboys. It doesn't lay out for what but in a movie that looks at longingly at Sacagawea and pokes fun amiably at Theodore Roosevelt and imagines their courtship and union, it could only be for one thing.
61
Vote
   


Imperium by Robert Harris

January 10th 2007 09:00
Imperium by Robert Harris
Imperium is Robert Harris's second novel after Pompeii set in Rome. Harris was a BBC reporter before turning to writing thrillers like Enigma which were supposed to rectify historical wrongs and credit the Brits their due in the glories of Second World War. He then turned to ancient Rome in Pompeii and has said that he fell in love with the era and so decided to revisit it in this novel.

It follows the mercurial rise of a young senator called Cicero in Roman politics. The novel is narrated by Tiro, Cicero's slave and now his invaluable amanuensis. Tiro had even invented shorthand to keep up with the senator's incessant flow of words. In history, there was an actual biography of Cicero written by Tyro which is now lost to us. Some of the conceit of this novel is to supply the re-imagined life of Cicero by Tyro.

In the beginning Cicero is a rookie senator who has worked hard to improve his oratory but his rigorous training makes the second best lawyer in Rome but does make him the political start he wanted to be. He is married to Terentia, an aristocratic woman who is conscious that he is married beneath her station but also fiercely protective of her home and hearth. He has a precious daughter called Tullia who is the apple of his eye.

This then is the world of Cicero until one day a man called Sthenius knocks his door. He is a vicitm of the corrupt exertion of a powerful governor called Verres. Verres has not only dispossessed Sthenius of his possessions but also has a orders his execution. Verres is politically well-connected and Cicero would be pleading the case of well an underdog. But as he realises the extent of Verres' depredations and comes to know that the first best lawyer in Rome is pleading on his behalf, Cicero takes the plunge. Thus starts one of the most interesting court cases in history of law.

As the case proceeds, inspite of some heavy challenges, Cicero also recognises the potential for his advancement: he can become an aedile or perhaps an praetorian based on the outcome of this case. And there is also that small matter of justice in his heart. The case won, Cicero is a big name and a huge star and now starts the second part of the novel with Cicero lunching with the bigwigs and being part of the conspiracies of the heavyweights.

When I first heard of the title, I immediately thought that this will be one more oblique references to the supposed current imperium. I was not wide off the mark. By the end of the period portrayed here, Rome turned from a republic into an empire, with Julius Caesar as its first emperor. This provides the all too familiar pop culture reference (remember Star Wars?) and since a Republican is in office these days, the reference is inescapable and not so oblique. Harris does not just stop at that of course, he also likens 9/11 attacks to pirate raids on Rome which started the power struggle that resulted the end of the republic. Translation. America's days as a republic are numbered. Boohoo.

As a reporter for BBC, Harris must have had the opportunity to observe the political life up close and Harris fills the novel with those little details that you'd find in a political gossip column. For all its glibness nevertheless, Imperium is a snappy, craftily engaged and mightily entertaining novel. Perhaps it's to do with Cicero who is drawn creditably by Harris. Perhaps it's to do with the ancient era called Rome whose magic is still potent. Whatever be the reason, I was charmed and so will you.
64
Vote
   


Capitalism in Islamic World--II

January 6th 2007 07:47
Lewis then describes how the growth in trade brought about growth in banking, an advantage that the Muslim world still enjoys:

The growth of large-scale trading and enterprise gave rise during ninth century to a development of banking.... Despite many attempts to stabilise the relative value of the metals of which they were made, and the Sarraf, or money-changer, came to be an essential feature of every Muslim market. In the ninth century, he developed into a banker on a large scale, no doubt supported by wealthy traders with money to invest. We hear of banks with a head office in Baghdad and branches in the other cities of the Empire and of an elaborate system of cheques, letters of credit etc, so developed that it was possible to draw a cheque in baghdad and cash it in Morocco. In Basra, the main centre of the flourishing eastern trade, we are told that every merchant had his bank account and that payments in the bazaar were effected only by cheque and never in cash.........

But, still more astonishing is the impact on literature:

The flourishing commercial life of the time was reflected in its thought and literature, where we find the upright merchant held up as an ideal ethical type. Traditions attributed to the Prophet inlcude such statements as " In the day of Judgement the honest truthful Msulin mechant will take rank with the martyrs of the faith", "The truthful merchant will sit under the shadow of the throne of God on Day of Judgement,"..... The Caliph Umar I is most improbably quoted as saying, " There is no place where I would be more gladly overtaken by death than in the market place, buyin and selling for my family." The essayist Jahiz in an essay entitled "In praise of mechants and in condemnation of officials" remarks that the approval of God for trading as a way of life is proved by His choice of the trading community of Quraish for his Prophet. The literature of the time includes portraits of the ideal upright merchant and much advice on the investment of money in trade.....

The self-consciousness implicit in such sayings probably indicates that this was a new way of life for the Muslims and the Arabs and hence, religious interpretation was necessary. It may also mean that there was a threat to this way of life.was a threat to this way of life then and that's why so much importance

And indeed there was. The glorious epoch also spawned a myriad revolts and the emergence of many sects like Ismailis who all would practise "communism of property and women." Most progressives would warn you about reactionaries. It occured to me that progressivism, socialism, communism, one of those isms are the true reactionary idealogies that crop up every time there was a burst of wealth and trade. Nothing like a full crop to attract a swarm of locusts.







70
Vote
   


Capitalism in Islamic World -- I

January 5th 2007 07:17
Earlier, I had written about capitalism in ancient Assyria. There was a burst of trade and capitalism in the same part of the world in a totally different epoch. The time is eighth century, the place is Baghdad.

From Bernard Lewis's book, Arabs in History:

The trade of Islamic Empire was of vast extent. From the Persian Gulf ports of Siraf, Basra and Ubulla and, to a lesser extent, from Aden and the Red Sea ports, Muslim merchants travelled to India, Ceylon, the East Indies and China, bringing silks, spices, aromatics, woods, tin and other commodities, both for home consumption and for re-export. .....

In Scandinavia, and especially in Sweden, scores of thousands of Muslim coins have been found bearing inscriptions dating from the late seventh to the earliy eleventh centuries, showing the period of efflorescense of Islamic trade. many finds of coins along the course of the Volga confirm the evidence of literary sources as to an extensive trade between the Islamic Empire and the Baltic via the Caspian, the Black Sea and Russia. .......

With Africa, too, the Arabs carried on an extensive overland trade, the chief commodities which they imported beging gold and slaves......

Apparently, even then capitalism had to contend with the Big Government and Petty Bureaucracy. Here's Lewis:

If the industry recieved some encouragement from the State, amingly from fiscal reasons, trade was not so helped, and even in such matters as the maintenance of roads the State seems to have done very little to promote commerce. The merchants were compelled to wage a constant struggle against the ever-encroaching bureaucracy. The economic action of the State was at first limited to a general ban on specualtion in vital food stuffs--nopt very effectively enforced-- and to the work of the Muhtasib, an urban official whose task it was to superintend the markets..... At a later date the State began to intervene more directly in commerce, even attempting to trade in and monopolise certain commodities for itself.




60
Vote
   


The Historian by Elizabeth Kostova

January 4th 2007 09:05
The Historian by Elizabeth Kostova

This was the book that came with a million dollar advance, a Hollywood contract, the marketing blitz lesser mortals can only dream of and an author who looks as if she’s made for a reprise of Dallas. The Historian is Elizabeth Kostova’s vampire novel. It is based on Vlad Tepis, the Wallachian prince, the real figure behind Bram Stoker’s Dracula character.

As tyrants go, Tepis has a middling record. He has killed around 20,000 of his own people, the book quotes at some point. Considering Saddam gassed hundreds of thousands and he has millions of fans who still think he’s some kind of martyr, 20,000 looks cheap. Vlad, you’re small fry, mate.

Vlad Tepes, The Real Dracula
The story or what passes for it, is this. A young girl finds a mysterious book in her diplomat father’s library. Her father is scared at first but then launches into his story of how he first found the book in his college days and how since then, Dracula had become his obsession. He was studying under a professor called Rossi who tells him that he had found a similar book that made him interested in Dracula too and that Dracula might be alive. It transpires that many historians have got the same present and Dracula might be luring historians.

This kind of terror setup reminds one Anne Radcliffe’s type of Gothic novel where everything will be explained at the end. But the book takes a dubious dip into the supernatural in the climax and cheats us of even that small satisfaction. As a terror novel, maybe it would have worked in the age of Boris Karloff. Most of the information about Vlad Tepes presented in this novel can be more simply gleaned from this website. How does Kostova then fill her tome? By adding more information about each and every secondary topic-- the fifteenth-century East European towns, the Turkish- European clashes etc etc—and spacing her chase toward a limp climax in every one of those dismal towns.


65
Vote
   


The Burning Stone by Kate Elliot

January 2nd 2007 07:31
The Burning Stone by Kate Elliot


In Prince of Dogs, Sanglant is rescued from his canine state and the Eika defeated and their leader Bloodheart killed by Liath. Everything seems to be set for a happy ending. But in The Burning Stone, Sanglant upsets the apple cart, when after a tepid romance, he marries Liath against the wishes of his father, for whom Liath is good enough to be a concubine but not as a royal wife. Therefore, both Sanglant and Liath run away and are given sanctuary at a remote cloister. Liath's mother Anne has resurfaced and has taken them into the cloister where Liath is supposed to be trained for the art of mathematici, the sorcery most feared by the church and also the most powerful.

Elsewhere, Father Hugh is in disgrace but in a trial for sorcery manages to get Liath convicted and himself escapes. Alain's father Lavastine is hounded and killed by Bloodheart's cursed hand. Since, Alain was adopted by Lavastine, his inheritance his contested and he quickly loses the countship.

Sanglant and Liath have a child called, of all things, Blessing but Liath's mother and her companions do not want them to be together and plot to separate them. The heart of the novel is the revelation that Liath is a descendant to the ancient royal throne of an emperor who had managed to unify the world and hence, her potent magical prowess is the linchpin for various interests in the novel.

The Burning Stone turns around the Crown of Stars saga and redeems the story mainly by concentrating on Liath's past and making the grand design, the conspiracy at the heart of the novel, clear to us. It is much more interesting that the tepid Prince of Dogs but it also lays all its cards open. I do not know how Elliot will manage the story in the remaining volumes but this volume has at least succeeded in retaining and awakening my interest in the series.
65
Vote
   


More Posts
2 Posts
1 Posts
2 Posts
175 Posts dating from August 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
Moderated by nagster
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]