It's always sex and money
August 25th 2007 10:02
This could be jejune or it could be true but it's fascinating and hilarious. I have wondered why the so-called secular, atheist Left has embraced the cause of obscurantist ideology like Islamic fascism and why gays and women would want to support sharia. Here's a great take on the subject, a comment on the blog The Belmont Club left by a casual reader, whiskey_199:
"Fundamentally, the Left does not want to preserve Western Civilization but destroy it.
Gay advocates know that overt expression of homosexuality will be punished by death, but Muslim rule will take most men out of the marriage market and force them into substitution, particularly with pornography forbidden. A nation of prison-sex in other words. A huge win for Gays and it explains their backing Muslim Sharia attempts.
Feminists of course view (probably correctly) middle class monogamous marriage a drain on women, and want to replace it with polygamy with powerful men. For them Sharia while inconvenient in dress and other freedoms offers a huge plus in the most important objective: sex and money from powerful men. This is why Feminists support Sharia Law and Islamist aggression. Well along with the undeniable fact that fighting Islamist aggression would move power from Feminists to soldiers.
The Left wants a feudal social hierarchy. Something like Castro's hereditary regime, with opportunities for "revolutionary violence" i.e. brutal killing for it's own sake unconstrained by any morals or standards. Not the least of which is the opportunities to seize property and become princelings. Fisk and TE Lawrence writing about their meetings with Osama and Faisal respectively might have well been describing the same event and man. The model for Leftists of society is a Pride of Lions, each young lion circling the aging lion waiting for his chance to drive off or kill the old one and seize all the females and resources.
Against this coalition of Leftists/Media/University people, Feminists, Gays there are unorganized and intimidated ordinary people. Who have been deliberately excluded from government, media, and politics. In European countries they have the choice of fleeing or turning to the only alternative: rightist politics.
But clearly Britain surrendered a long time ago. They won't fight so the sunk cost has already been written off."
No comments necessary. It's really fascinating stuff.
"Fundamentally, the Left does not want to preserve Western Civilization but destroy it.
Gay advocates know that overt expression of homosexuality will be punished by death, but Muslim rule will take most men out of the marriage market and force them into substitution, particularly with pornography forbidden. A nation of prison-sex in other words. A huge win for Gays and it explains their backing Muslim Sharia attempts.
Feminists of course view (probably correctly) middle class monogamous marriage a drain on women, and want to replace it with polygamy with powerful men. For them Sharia while inconvenient in dress and other freedoms offers a huge plus in the most important objective: sex and money from powerful men. This is why Feminists support Sharia Law and Islamist aggression. Well along with the undeniable fact that fighting Islamist aggression would move power from Feminists to soldiers.
The Left wants a feudal social hierarchy. Something like Castro's hereditary regime, with opportunities for "revolutionary violence" i.e. brutal killing for it's own sake unconstrained by any morals or standards. Not the least of which is the opportunities to seize property and become princelings. Fisk and TE Lawrence writing about their meetings with Osama and Faisal respectively might have well been describing the same event and man. The model for Leftists of society is a Pride of Lions, each young lion circling the aging lion waiting for his chance to drive off or kill the old one and seize all the females and resources.
Against this coalition of Leftists/Media/University people, Feminists, Gays there are unorganized and intimidated ordinary people. Who have been deliberately excluded from government, media, and politics. In European countries they have the choice of fleeing or turning to the only alternative: rightist politics.
But clearly Britain surrendered a long time ago. They won't fight so the sunk cost has already been written off."
No comments necessary. It's really fascinating stuff.
| 41 |
| Vote |
Add Comments
Comments (2)
